NEMA Contract Probe: Reps Investigation Suffers Setback
The investigation by the House of Representatives Committee on Emergency and Disaster Preparedness, of the N8 billion grains supply contracts, has run into hitches.
The beneficiary companies were to supply grains to the Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) in the North East.
The probe was truncated after the Accountant General of the Federation; Mr. Idris Ahmed appealed to Rep. Isa Ali led Committee, not to disclose contents of the documents required because they were classified as security information.
NEMA also could not make any presentation at the hearing due to the failure of its Director General, Mr. Mustapha Maihaja, to appear for the second time in a row.
The Director of Relief and Rehabilitation, Mr. Kayode Fagbemi, who was again mandated to represent him was rejected by the committee but asked to stay through the proceedings as an observer.
The committee, during an earlier hearing, had interrogated three of the companies that benefitted from the emergency food programme and the food security programme on the basis of the release of the funds to them.
All but one of the companies, namely BUA, Three Brothers Rice Mill, Dangote could not tell the committee exactly what office the contract for their supply of grains emanated from.
Only Olam stated that while it did not apply to NEMA for the contract to supply food to the North East or mop up grains for off-season use, it was granted the job by the agency.
Olam also said it received payment from the office, though it had an outstanding of N274 million.
However, one of the documents before the committee revealed that the disbursement, which all companies said was not a loan facility, came from the Central Bank of Nigeria as a public/private partnership arrangement.
The document showed that it was supposed to be a loan facility to the beneficiary companies.
They also queried the permanent secretary of the Finance Ministry on another document which showed that the authorisation to the Central Bank of Nigeria to pay the companies was issued by his office.
In his presentation earlier, the representative of BUA could not tell the committee the agency that awarded the contract to his company, and also said he did not know if there was an award letter or agreement between the federal government and his company in relation to the contract to supply soya beans.
This was after he had earlier submitted that there was no contract or agreement to that effect.
While adding that all grains have been given to NEMA, he added that BUA did not apply to CBN for the contract.
On its part, Olam’s vice president (Rice), Mr. Reggie George stated again that it did not bid for the N2.4 billion contract it got but was informed by the Ministry of Agriculture to send an invoice to the Ministry of Finance, after a Rice Processors of Nigeria meeting.
He also added that there was no advertisement or bidding process that the company responded to or participated in.
Responding to inquiries by the lawmakers, the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Mr. Mahmud Isa-Dutse, disclosed that there was no contractual agreement, just an instruction from the office of the Accountant General to pay N5.8 billion to some companies, which they complied with.
Office of the accountant general, however, said it was not aware of any dealings of the contract.
The controversy surrounding the legal status of the Three Brothers Rice Mill continued at the hearing as documents related to the company showed three in figure (4) instead of in words as the company’s representatives claimed was the correct name.
The Corporate Affairs Commission and other relevant agencies were directed by the committee to submit all documents related to the company in either of the 2 names in the next hearing on Thursday, which is expected to be the last.